LIKELIHOOD OF SHORT-INTERVAL REPEAT COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY PULMONARY ANGIOGRAM YIELDING A POSITIVE RESULT

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Brain dead or not? CT angiogram yielding false-negative result on brain death confirmation.

We describe a case of severe traumatic brain injury with multiple facial and skull fractures where CT angiogram (CTA) failed to yield a definite result of brain death as an ancillary test. A 28-year-old man was admitted following a road traffic accident with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 3/15 and fixed pupils. CT brain revealed uncal herniation and diffuse cerebral oedema with associated multip...

متن کامل

A SHORT PROOF OF A RESULT OF NAGEL

Let $(R,fm)$ be a Gorenstein local ring and$M,N$ be two finitely generated modules over $R$. Nagel proved that if $M$ and $N$ are inthe same even liaison class, thenone has $H^i_{fm}(M)cong H^i_{fm}(N)$ for all $iIn this paper, we provide a short proof to this result.

متن کامل

Thrombolytic therapy in a patient with suspected pulmonary embolism despite a negative computed tomography pulmonary angiogram.

We report a case of a 62-year-old male who presented to our intensive care unit with hypoxemia 6 hours after retinal surgery. He had a negative computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiogram, but an emergency echocardiogram revealed the McConnell sign. He was thrombolysed and had rapid improvement in oxygenation and hemodynamics. Thrombolysis in hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism is not ...

متن کامل

A short remark on the result of Jozsef Sandor

It is pointed out that, one of the results in the recently published article, ’On the Iyengar-Madhava Rao-Nanjundiah inequality and it’s hyperbolic version’ [3] by J´ozsef S´andor is logically incorrect and new corrected result with it’s proof is presented.

متن کامل

Repeat Consistency of a Result

We address the following issue: Suppose that we have taken a dataset consisting of a set of events. We do an analysis on this dataset, and obtain a result of interest. We then take the same dataset, and repeat the analysis, possibly with differences, to again obtain a result on the same matter of interest. How do we determine whether our two results are “consistent”? Let us first attempt to ens...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Chest

سال: 2019

ISSN: 0012-3692

DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.08.989